DIY food storage Containers

Storage of food in Central Anatolia 2. millennium BC. AD

August 29, 2013 – 02:39

Festive Pot Luck Food Storage Containers || Free clever craft


I. Problems and limits of the subject. It is a truism to say that the food was and remains one of, if not the main concern of any population. The issue of food stocks is stirred and famine are far from having disappeared in the current world market. These concerns were equally important in central Anatolia in the second millennium BC. BC (periods of Assyrian and Hittite Cappadocia counters), this thesis and the study of the preservation and storage of food in this period helped to highlight the different methods used. As an archaeologist by training, I focused my research primarily on the archaeological remains, but all the documentation has been taken into account whether the ceramic seals, as well as written sources or data provided by archaeobotany, archaeozoology and entomology and chemical analysis. This interdisciplinary approach, allowing for the fullest possible view, is an absolute necessity for areas of research such as this. These data are also supplemented their nuanced interpretation or depth by information provided by experimental archeology and ethnoarchaeology. II. The corpus. The subject has never been a synthesis, it was necessary first list all sites in this zone and determine which of them had storage devices or information on food preservation. The full documentation of the 56 identified for the geographical and chronological area sites was taken into account (volumes 2 and 3) with the primary objective to identify and study in detail the facilities, fixed and mobile, dedicated to storage. Each device is discussed and analyzed for himself and all the clues to determine how the existing management, including the brands carried by ceramics and seals. The textual sources that have survived are both tablets written in Akkadian cuneiform and Hittite and Luwian hieroglyphic inscriptions in clay. They have, as far as possible, been identified and used. All these data are treated, as far as possible, by occupancy levels, from the oldest to the newest. Each of the identified sites is subject to a comprehensive study (Volume 2) and illustrated (Volume 3), presented in alphabetical order of the current names. Volume 2 is preceded by an introduction explaining the organization of the volume, the method used to determine the corpus and the difficulties encountered. III. Analysis and synthesis of data. Volume 1 is divided into four parts, a synthesis of all the data collected and examined in the documentary corpus while combining the information provided by ethnoarchaeology and experimental archeology and supplemented by comparison with other research areas. III.1. The food and conservation methods. The first part concerns the preservation of food. In this context, are first presented food resources were available (Chapter 1). This work is based on both the information provided by the text and archaeobotanical, zooarchaeological and entomological analysis. With these data, it is possible to compile a list of resources, but it is sometimes difficult to determine what was actually consumed in the absence of specific indications. The factors responsible for the limitation of food preservation are then studied to determine the potential causes of degradation: environmental data, attacks by "harmful", etc.. (Chapter 2). Several methods can be used to extend the shelf life of these products, such as techniques for drying, smoking, salting or using different liquids with antioxidant properties, or a combination of several of these techniques (Chapter 3). Some case studies are then available from major food groups such as cereals, meat and fish, fruit and drinks, alcoholic or not (water, wine, beer, but milk and its derivatives) (Chapter 4). III.2. Analysis of storage devices. The second part is devoted to a detailed examination of the storage devices. Having established definitions, each device is considered a functional point of view, material, construction techniques, dimensions, operation, etc.. It is thus possible to list the characteristics of each structure and prepare for some of them, a typology (Chapter 1). We then found the main use for shops and storage rooms in general, but also the silos (different modules, the best known are those of the Hittite capital Bogazköy / Hattusa) and pits. Other types of devices are most often evidenced only by texts such as barns or attics (?) Or the buildings were not identified as such, or they were located only in rural areas ( unexcavated) or that it is due to random searches. The second and final chapter of this part deals with the study of facilities some of these devices which can be fitted and the containers, most of which consists of the ceramic. However, containers of perishable materials, although very rarely preserved in Central Anatolia, are not omitted. They are particularly addressed through ethnographic and textual data, but also thanks to fingerprints stored on the back of the seals. Much attention is paid to the methodology set up to study the storage containers to identify their function and archaeological visibility (causing an imbalance between the different types of containers that have survived). Case studies are also available here, all of the Anatolian ceramic could not be treated in detail. By using a few studies on textual sources and some archaeobotanical remains found in containers, we questioned the ability to match the old names with excavations uncovered containers but also foods with these containers. If you can sometimes succeed to match certain terms with ceramic forms, there is however, no container appears to be for a single commodity, but at most, and even in rare cases, to broad categories of food (solid or liquid). Finally, a short section attempts to put these containers in their archaeological context and determine the organization and provision of internal storage space. III.3. Protection and management of storage space. The third part is devoted in turn to the protection and management of storage space. It is divided into two chapters. The protection and security of storage devices is first analyzed (Chapter 1), through two aspects: protection against natural attacks and securing devices against theft. The first aspect comprises the means to fight against potential damage. Several techniques are used, often in conjunction in order to get optimal storage conditions: it will, among other things, animal traps religious incantations through natural repellents and insecticides. Mantras can also be used as a means to fight against theft. In this case, it is best to secure access to reserves (door, window, etc..), Usually by limiting or by providing them with closures (seals and locks). The guard is also used. A long chapter is devoted to the management of food (Chapter 2). It brings together all the clues to reconstruct. Indeed, the administrative practices of the second millennium Anatolia are still relatively unknown (except in very general terms), especially for storage but also for all aspects related to food (livestock management, gardens and fields, distribution of rations, etc..). Thus, marking jars is first taken into account as well as the analysis of some ceramics have been part of this system namely "crescents" (objects shaped crescent, often perforated their ends). The study continues with the treatment of seals and written sources. Arrangement of seals at the time of discovery can, if that is accurate and up a comprehensive study be conducted to determine which was sealed and that and so restore a portion of the internal administrative organization and its relationship with the outside (this is of course mainly for large organizations but also, to a lesser extent, to the domestic context). The textual sources are interviewed here in terms of agricultural and religious calendar (some Hittite festivals, called "seasonal", involving storage devices) and the staff related to food (including analysis of their securities as AGRIG, head of the royal stores the Hittite period). Finally, the location of storage space is again taken into account, then an interest in the practical aspects of their management (as filling). III.4. Synthesis. Once cataloged and analyzed, it is necessary to contextualize both topographic, across the city, geographically, across the Central Anatolia, administrative and history in order to make an assessment period by period (first paleo-Assyrian period and the Hittite period), methods of conservation and storage techniques. Note a large disproportion in the data, but also a difference in the nature of the available documentation, including textual level, for each period. Indeed, the period of Assyrian counters Cappadocia mainly delivered mansions and private archives (to Kültepe, former Kanes, etc.) while the texts of the Hittite area mostly belong to the religious sphere and the Hittite habitat we is less well known. Similarly, the political and administrative organization of the two periods is not quite similar. However, the data are quite popular complementary and comparison between the two periods allows for a more comprehensive picture. IV. Conclusion. In the current state of the literature, the picture drawn here is still incomplete, however, that careful examination helps to understand how storage is integrated into the daily lives of ancient Anatolia. And storage seems to have been everywhere. It was not possible to identify technical developments concerning methods of preservation or storage devices or real geographical features. However, the results of this study clearly show that the presence of storage facilities and the way they were designed to meet specific needs that generally fall into the ways of thinking and broader organization. This reflection therefore urges us to look deeper into the fundamental aspects of everyday life and in particular to take into account the storage facilities, including simple pits, sometimes neglected. We must learn to look at these devices as more than mere technical facilities and to consider an interdisciplinary perspective. In fact, their study helps to establish the foundations of a much closer reality of ancient knowledge in areas as diverse as the history of technology, planning or administrative organization in Anatolia in the second millennium BC . BC This is true for storage but also for other areas of daily life too little discussed. I. Subject and scope. It is a truism to say That food was and remains one of the main Concerns of a population, if not icts main concern. Still today, the problem of stocks of foodstuffs keeps the markets in flux, and famines in the world are far from HAVING Disappeared. These Concerns Were Equally significant in Central Anatolia falling on the second millennium BC (periods of the Assyrian, Hittite merchant then colonies in Cappadocia), the context of this thesis, and the study of the preservation and storage of foodstuffs falling on this period Allows us to shed light on the various methods then used. As an archaeologist, I have Given priority in my research to archaeological remains, order all available documentation has-been taken into account, it Concerns Whether ceramic pots and seals, gold Involves written sources or data from archaeo-botany, archaeo-zoology, entomology or Chemical analyzes. This interdisciplinary approach, Enabling The Most Complete view possible is an absolute necessity for research areas: such as this one. The abovementioned data aussi Supplemented, icts nuanced interpretation and deepened by information provided by experimental archeology and ethno-archeology. II. Corpus. Since no detailed overview of the subject Previously Existed, it was first Necessary to list all the attractions in this area, and possessed of Them All which determines storage facilities or information on the conservation of foodstuffs. The complete documentation of the 56 sites inventoried for the geographic and chronological area was Examined (volumes 2 and 3) in the aim of listing and studying in detail Both fixed and mobile storage facilities. Each facility is Discussed and Analyzed in icts own right, as are all signs or clues as to how it was managed, notably marks on pots and seals. Textual sources HAVING come down to us are Both clay tablets written in Akkadian cuneiform Hittite gold and inscriptions in Luwian hieroglyphs. To the extent possible, They Were inventoried and used. All this data was processed, to the best of our capabilities, According to occupancy levels, from the ancient to the MOST Most recent. Each of the websites APPROBATION was Studied in depth (volume 2) and illustrated (Volume 3), presented in alphabetical order using present-day names. Volume 2 is Preceded by an introduction explaining the volume's organization, the method used to determined the corpus and the Difficulties Encountered. III. Analysis and synthesis of data. Volume 1, in four parts, is a synthesis of all the data and Gathered Examined in the documentary corpus. This data is combined with information from aussi ethno-archeology and experimental archeology, Supplemented by the comparison with other research domains. III.1. Foodstuffs and preservation methods. The first portion deals with the preservation of foodstuffs. Under this heading, we first list available food resources (chapter 1) Both based on information found in texts and archaeo-botanical, archaeo-zoological and entomological analysis. Thanks to this data, it is possible, to list resources, lack of purpose in the precise information it is sometimes difficulty to what was determined Actually Consumed. Factors Limiting the conservation of foodstuffs are then Studied, in order to be determined causes of degradation: environmental data, attacks by pests, etc.. (Chapter 2). Several means clustering can be used to the prolonged preservation of foodstuffs, technology: such as drying, smoking, salting, or using various liquids with anti-oxidising properties, even a combination of technical thesis (chapter 3). We then present case studies A Few Within the broad categories of foods: grains, meat and fish, fruits and Both alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks (water, wine, beer, milk and its goal aussi derivatives) (chapter 4). III.2. Analysis of storage facilities. The second hand is Devoted to the detailed study of storage facilities. Having Established a set of definitions, we view EACH system from a functional points of view: materials, construction techniques, dimensions, how it works, etc.. This Enables us to list the Specificities of Each structure and Establish a typology for some (chapter 1). We See That majorité are the warehouses and storage rooms, but there are aussi silos (different modules, the best known Being Those of the Hittite capital, Bogazköy / Hattusa) and underground pits. Other kinds of facilities are MOST Often Mentioned in texts as barns or granaries possibly, Either Because the building Were not later APPROBATION as storage facilities, or Because They Were located outside the cities and not Excavated, or due to the luck element of excavations. The second and last chapter in this hand examined the layout to be found in some of These structures as well as the containers, the majorité of All which are ceramic pots, HOWEVER, we have-nots omitted containers made of perishable materials, though rarely They Have beens preserved in Central Anatolia. They are Brought up in Particular thanks to textual and ethnographic data, as well as to preserved imprints on the backs of seals. A great deal of care has-been Placed on the methodology to be set up for the study of storage containers, in order to Identify Their function and archaeological visibility, All which leads to a disproportion betweens the different kinds of containers HAVING come down to us. Given the impossibility of treating In all Anatolian pots in detail, we present some case studies. Using A Few studies based on textual sources and archaeo-botanical remains Discovered in containers, the issue Arose as to the possibility of matching up with ancient names containers Discovered in excavations, the purpose aussi thesis same containers with foodstuffs. Altho it is sometimes possible, make sure to match terms with some shapes of pot, no container Seems destined for a single foodstuff - at best, and only in unusual cases, for broad categories: such as solids or liquids. Finally, a short section Attempts to put in containers thesis Their archaeological context and determines the organization and workings of internal storage spaces. III.3. Protection and management of storage spaces. The third portion is Devoted to the protection and management of storage spaces. It is in two chapters. The protection and Securing of storage facilities is first Analyzed (chapter 1) in terms of two aspects: protection against attacks and natural Securing against burglary. The first appearance regroups ways of Combating potential deterioration. Several technologies are used, Often together, so as to accomplish achieve optimum storage conditions: animal traps, natural insect repellents and insecticides, religious incantations and others. Incantations aussi can be used against burglaries. I'm his case, it is preferable to secure access to storage rooms (doors, windows, etc., most is Often by Limiting Their number or by supplier providing em with closure devices (seals and locks). Aussi Guardians are employed. A long chapter is Devoted to the management of food stocks (chapter 2). It regroups all directions That might enable us to reconstitute how stocks Were managed. Administrative practices of the second millennium Anatolian are still not very well known, in Particular Concerning storage, goal aussi for all aspects linked to food (management of herds, gardens and fields, distribution of rations, etc..). THUS we turn first to the marking of earthenware pottery, as well as to the analysis of some ceramic objects All which Could have been included in the system derived, namely "lunulae" (crescent shaped objects Benthic, usually perforated at Either end.) On the status of a full and precise study, the place Where a seal was Discovered Enables us to know what was inside the sealed jar and by Whom and reconstitute share of Malthus the internal administrative organization and Its Relations with the outside world (this is true of course, Mainly for large administrative bodies goal aussi was smaller scale, in the domestic context). Textual sources are Examined from the points of view of the agricultural and religious calendar (some Hittite festivals, known as "seasonal", included storage facilities) and aussi from the points of view of the staff linked with foodstuffs (in Particular through the analysis of Their titles, AGRIG: such as, the person in charge of royal stock falling on the Hittite era). Finally, the location of storage spaces is again Considered, with emphasis on practical aspects of management (filling, for example). Synthesis. Analyzed Once cataloged and III.4., data must be put back in context icts - topographic at once, on the scale of the city, geography, on the scale of Central Anatolia, administrative and historic - in order to draw up an inventory, period by period (Old Assyrian, Hittite then), methods of conservation and storage technology . There is significant disparity in the data, goal aussi there a difference in the nature of available documentation for EACH of the periods, textual in Particular. The period of the Assyrian merchant colonies in Cappadocia tells us about Mainly private dwellings and archives (Particularly in Kültepe, formerly Kanes) Whereas the majorité of Hittite texts belong to the religious sphere and we know less about Hittite habitat. In like Manner, political and administrative organization is not exactly similar in the two periods. HOWEVER, the data was Sufficiently Consulted complementary and the comparison betweens the two periods Gives us a more precise conclusion. Given the present state of documentation IV. overview., the partial picture presented here is still only. HOWEVER, this careful examination nonetheless Enables us to Understand how storage was an integral share of the daily life of the ancient Anatolians, and a seemingly ubiquitous feature. It was not possible, to detect technical evolutions Regarding conservation methods or storage Mechanisms, or true geographical particularities. HOWEVER, the results of this study show Clearly That storage facilities and the Way They Were Conceived Usually answered Were All which needs to precise hand and parcel of more global modes of thought and organization. This idea prompts us to examine more Closely The Fundamental aspects of daily life, and Among Others, to take into account storage facilities, Including Simple pits underground, All which are sometimes neglected It is significant to see thesis facilities have more than mere technical facilities and to view 'em from an interdisciplinary points of view:. Their study Provides us with Fundamental knowledge much closer to the reality of ancient times in fields as diverse as the history of technology, urban development or the administrative organization in Anatolia in the second millennium BC This is true for storage, as it is for other areas of daily life as yet insufficiently Studied. I. Problematica e della ricerca limit. E 'un'ovvietà say the alimentazione che sia stata una delle e resti preoccupazioni principali di tutte le popolazioni. The immagazzinamento delle derrate alimentari è ancor oggi a all'ordine problema del giorno dei mercati globalization carestie the e sono lungi dall'essere scomparse. Preoccupazioni not the minority riguardarono popolazioni dell'Anatolia del Millennio II aC (it periodo delle colony Assire di Cappadocia), che costituisce it tema di questa tesi. In quanto archeologa, ho concentrato soprattutto sulla mia attenzione problematica archeologica e sui dati della cultura materiale my ho preso anche in considerazione i risultati delle analisi archeobotaniche, archeozoologiche, entomologiche e chimiche. Mi sono anche a lungo soffermata sulle fonti epigrafiche, cercando dare alla mia di ricerca a interdisciplinare approccio. II. He corpus. The argomento non è stato prima ora trattato da Studi di sintesi. If è dovuto quindi procedere ad una schedatura dettagliata, per sito sito, del materiale per quanto riguarda i dispositivi di stoccaggio e dei prodotti di conservazione alimentari. I dati sono relativi has 56 siti nei forniti alfabeticamente voll. 2 e 3, che sia in forma narrativa in forma grafica e tabellare. I testi cuneiformi pertinenti trattati sono per lo più traduzione in, mettendo in rilievo quando necessario problemi di ordine e lessicale interpretative. Ciascun dispositivo è stato sottoposto ad analisi specifica, riferendolo reed al tipo di sistema di gestione delle risorse ricostruibile. III. Analisi dei dati e sintesi. There Volume 1 diviso in quattro party fornisce the e sintesi the Conclusioni dell'intero lavoro incrociando i dati archeologici ed epigrafici con quelli etnoarcheologici e sperimentali. III.1. Derrate e metodi di conservazione. The prima parte dei prodotti regards conservazione alimentari. If Inizia con una delle presentazione del repetoire risorse alimentari disponibili (capitolo 1). If it held poi dei fattori responsibilities del degrado organico e dei limiti conservazione dei prodotti di, dai fattori ambientali agli insetti, ecc. (Capitolo 2). Diversi mezzi possono utilizzati per essere prolungare the conservazione di prodotti alimentari tali, come the TECNICHE di essiccazione, concimazione di, di di salatura o utilizzazione diversified liquidity con proprietà antiossidanti, o una addirittura combinazione di di parecchie queste TECNICHE (capitolo 3). If propongono da ultimo degli Studi di casi, che riguardano the growing category of alimenti: cereali, latte e suoi derivati, carne, pesci, frutta e bevande (acqua e bevande inebrianti) (capitolo 4). III.2. Analisi dei dispositivi di stoccaggio. La seconda parte della tesi è dedicata all'esame dei dispositivi di stoccaggio. Dopo aver discusso the terminologia e fissato the definizioni TECNICHE, ogni dispositivo considerato è dal punto di vista funzionale: materiale, TECNICHE di costruzione, dimensioni, funzionamento ecc. If così has reached the stabilire lista dei caratteri specifici di ogni di una struttura all'interno typology (capitolo 1). PA considerati magazzini e non solo generici locali di stoccaggio my reed e pit silos. Altri tipi di dispositivi, attestati unicamente dai testi (Fienili Granai o) e sul non identificati Terreno, vengono ugualmente discussi. It secondo di questa parte capitolo riguarda lo Studio dei contenitori (per lo più di ceramica, ma non solo) e delle sigillature apposte knew di essi. Reed that vengono proposti Studi di casi, per the impossibilità in modo di trattare the problematiche completo della Ceramica di secondo anatolica Millennio. If it tra l'altro sofferma sulla nomenclature dei recipienti tional fonti testuali, proponendo alcune ipotesi di identificazione. Anche quando è possibile o the identificazione probabile if riscontra tuttavia pratica utilizzare lo stesso di tipo di prodotti alimentari contenitore per diver. Infine, in una breve parte final if tried di questi collocare contenitori nel loro e contesto archeologico di determinare the organizzazione e disposizione the international spazi degli di stoccaggio. III.3. Protezione e di gestione degli spazi stoccaggio. La terza parte è dedicata allo studio della gestione e degli protezione spazi di stoccaggio. The protezione the e sicurezza dei magazzini sono da analizzate due punti di vista (capitolo 1) the protezione contro gli attacchi naturali e sicurezza the contro i Furti. Diverse TECNICHE difesa sono di utilizzate, spesso congiunto in modo, per creare condizioni ottimali di conservazione: slab trappole per animali, agli insetticidi naturalization, agli incantesimi. Gli incantesimi possono essere anche come utilizzati modo di lotta contro i Furti. The sicurezza è ricercata attraverso limitazione the door di e finestre che vengono per lo più di muniti dispositivi di chiusura (sigillatura chiavistello e). A poi è lungo capitolo dedicato German gestione dei prodotti alimentari (capitolo 2). The pratiche amministrative del secondo Millennio in Anatolia sono ancora relativamente evil conosciute sia per quanto riguarda the diretta gestione degli alimenti sia ad altri aspetti essa legati (gestione degli animali, dei giardini e dei campi distribuzione delle razioni ecc.). I marchi apposti sulle giare costituiscono di uno degli elementi riflessione. My vi sono anche altri materiali discussi, come on falciparum di luna miniaturizzate in ceramica e, naturalmente the sigillature. The disposizione delle sigillature al momento della loro scoperta allows infatti - has condizione che vi sia a rilievo preciso - determinare di quello che era sigillato e per conto di chi e così una parte di ricostituire dell'organizzazione amministrativa international e dei suoi rapporti esterno the con. Slab fonti testuali ittite if ricavano in proposito molte informazioni has cui if aggiungono what sul calendario agricolo e religioso e sul personale addetto have prodotti alimentari (per are. The AGRIG, responsabile dei magazzini reali). III.4. Sintesi. Una volta catalogati e analizzati, i dati devono essere rimessi nel loro contesto, tanto topografico, alla scala della città, geografico, alla scala dell'Anatolia centrale, che amministrativo e storico allo scopo di stabilire un bilancio, periodo per periodo (prima il periodo paleo assiriano poi il periodo ittita) dei metodi di conservazione e delle tecniche di stoccaggio. Si osserva una grande sproporzione nei dati ma anche, per ogni periodo, una differenza nelle natura della documentazione disponibile soprattutto al livello testuale. Infatti il periodo dei fondachi assiriani della Cappadocia ha messo in evidenza principalmente delle abitazioni e degli archivi privati (a Kültepe, l'antica Kanes soprattutto) allora che i testi del dominio ittita appartengono in maggior parte alla sfera religiosa che l'abitazione ittita ci é conosciuta meno bene. Del resto l'organizzazione politica e amministrativa dei due periodi non é del tutto simile. Nonostante ciò i dati consultati sono abbastanza complementari e il paragone fra i due periodi permette di avere una visione d'insieme più precisa. IV. Conclusione. Nello stato attuale della documentazione il quadro presentato é ancora parziale, ma questo esame approfondito permette di capire in che modo lo stoccaggio si integrava nella vita quotidiana degli antichi Anatoliani. E pare che lo stoccaggio sia stato presente ovunque. Non é stato possibile scoprire le evoluzioni tecniche relative ai metodi di conservazione o ai dispositivi di stoccaggio, né delle vere e proprie particolarità geografiche. Ciò nonostante i risultati di questo studio dimostrano chiaramente che la presenza di installazioni di stoccaggio e il modo con cui sono state concepite rispondono a dei bisogni precisi che si inscrivono generalmente in modi di pensiero e di organizzazione globali. Questa riflessione ci spinge dunque a considerare con maggior profondità gli aspetti fondamentali della vita quotidiana e più specialmente a prendere in considerazione le sistemazioni di stoccaggio, comprese le semplici fosse talvolta trascurate. Bisogna imparare a considerare questi dispositivi non solo come semplici installazioni tecniche ma anche da un punto di vista interdisciplinare. Infatti il loro studio permette di stabilire i fondamenti di une conoscenza molto più vicina alla realtà antica in domini tanto diversi quanto la storia delle tecniche, l'urbanistica o ancora l'organizzazione amministrativa dell'Anatolia durante il II millennio avanti Cristo. Questo é vero per lo stoccaggio ma ugualmente per altri domini della vita quotidiana ancora troppo poco evocati.


FoodSaver FoodSaver T03-0006-02P Regular-Mouth Jar Sealer
Kitchen (FoodSaver)
  • Jar-sealer attachment fits on pint- and quart-sized Mason jars
  • For use with any FoodSaver machine with an accessory port
  • Great for sealing sauces, jams, liquids, and dry goods
  • Helps keep food fresh 3 to 5 times longer than other methods
  • Measures approximately 3-1/2 by 3-1/2 by 2-1/4 inches

You might also like:

Underground storage container
Underground storage container

Cat container idea

Is the cheapest method as we do that..just make sure you wash it well..
You may need 2 or 3 of them though since we use 2 for our 40 lb bag of dog food,but since our food runs out like every 2 - 2 1/2 weeks or so,it doesnt stay in the container for long lol.
But lately we are deciding just to chuck out the containers and go buy the containers for the food storage so it'll just be one container to use.

Purina ONE® Elevates Feeding Experience For Cats At Maker Faire  — SYS-CON Media
An example of a DIY puzzle feeder includes "The Wheel," which is made by cutting a few holes in a round food container (such as an empty margarine or sour cream container). ...

Infantino Infantino Squeeze Station
Baby Product (Infantino)
  • Create on the go baby food in 4 easy steps
  • Fill 3 squeeze pouches at a time
  • Non skid base won t budge
  • Soft rubber press allows for easy grip
  • Dishwasher safe
The Vinyl Wall 40 Chalk Labels - Chalkboard Labels in Ovals and Rectangles - Chalkboard Stickers
Home (The Vinyl Wall)
  • HUGE set of 40 includes: (20) 2 x1 rectangles and (20) 2 x1 ovals
  • These are small labels - so make sure the size will work for your project!
  • Simple to usejust peel and stick
  • Write on with regular chalk or chalkboard markers (like Chalk Ink) and wipe clean with a damp cloth.
  • Organize your home, office or classroom!
Better Homes & Gardens Storage with Style (Better Homes & Gardens Do It Yourself)
Book (Better Homes & Gardens)
Infantino Infantino Steam and Smush
Baby Product (Infantino)
  • Includes 1 smush masher, 1 vented lid, 1 steam basket and 1 smush bowl
  • Soft, easy to grip rubber handle stays cool
  • Microwave safe
  • Dishwasher safe
  • BPA, PVC and phthalate free

Related posts:

  1. Amazon food storage containers
  2. Green Food Storage Containers
  3. Funky food Storage containers